Oral Presentation Royal Australian Chemical Institute National Congress 2026

Aza-BODIPY Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy (136746)

Sandra Wiedbrauk 1 , Astrid Larin 1 , Nathan RB Boase 1 , Kathryn E Fairfull-Smith 1
  1. School of Chemistry and Physics and Centre for Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Organic photosensitizers are versatile chromophores capable of absorbing light and transferring energy to surrounding molecules or mediating photochemical transformations. Relative to widely used inorganic photocatalysts, a key advantage of organic systems is the ability to finely tune their photophysical properties through rational molecular design. Photosensitizers are central to photodynamic therapy (PDT),¹,² an emerging, non-invasive clinical modality for the treatment of malignant tissues and pathogenic bacterial infections that offers high spatiotemporal control with reduced side effects.³

Increasing attention has been directed toward 4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY)-derived photosensitizers owing to their excellent photostability and synthetic versatility.⁴ Established strategies to enhance the performance of BODIPY photosensitizers⁵ focus on improving intersystem crossing (ISC) and tailoring solubility, targeting, or emission properties, most commonly through heavy-atom substitution to increase spin–orbit coupling.⁶ An alternative and conceptually distinct approach to promoting ISC and accessing long-lived triplet excited states—thereby enhancing singlet oxygen generation—relies on spin–spin interactions between a photoexcited organic chromophore and a stable radical.⁷ Herein, we report the synthesis and evaluation of nitroxide-functionalized azaBODIPY photosensitizers for potential application in PDT.

  1. 1. E. Nestoros, A. Sharma, E. Kim, J. S. Kim, M. Vendrell, Nat Rev Chem 2025, 9, 46-60
  2. 2. P. P. Singh, S. Sinha, P. Gahtori, D. N. Mishra, G. Pandey, V. Srivastava, Dyes and Pigments 2024, 229.
  3. 3. H. Abrahamse, M. R. Hamblin, Biochem J 2016, 473, 347-364.
  4. 4. E. Bassan, A. Gualandi, P. G. Cozzi, P. Ceroni, Chem Sci 2021, 12, 6607-6628; bM. C. Malacarne, M. B. Gariboldi, E. Caruso, Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23.
  5. 5. A. L. K. Burgess, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4891-4932; bG. Ulrich, R. Ziessel, A. Harriman, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2008, 47, 1184-1201.
  6. 6. T. Yogo, Y. Urano, Y. Ishitsuka, F. Maniwa, T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12162-12163.
  7. 7. A. Kawai, K. Obi, J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 52-56.